Debate on "The Media is Responsible for Violence in Society"

Chairperson (Mr. Rao): Good afternoon, everyone. Welcome to today’s debate on the topic, "The Media is Responsible for Violence in Society." Our first participant is Priya, who will speak in favor of the statement. Priya, you have the floor.

Priya: Thank you, Mr. Rao. I believe the media plays a big role in promoting violence. Many movies and shows show violent acts as cool or exciting. This can influence people, especially young viewers. They may think violence is normal. 

Moreover, news channels often show violent events repeatedly. This can create fear and desensitize people to real-life violence. When people see violence often, they may become less sensitive to its effects. It can even lead some to act violently themselves.

In addition, social media spreads violent content quickly. It can reach many people in a short time. This can lead to real-life violence, as we have seen in some cases. Therefore, the media is indeed responsible for violence in society.

Chairperson (Mr. Rao): Thank you, Priya. Now, I invite our second participant, Arjun, to share his views against the statement. Arjun, please go ahead.

Arjun: Thank you, Mr. Rao. While I understand Priya’s points, I disagree. The media does not create violence; it reflects society. Violence has existed long before media became popular. People have their own choices and control their actions.

Also, many media programs promote peace and kindness. Documentaries and news stories often highlight positive actions. They show how communities come together to help each other. 

Lastly, blaming the media oversimplifies the problem. We must look at factors like family, education, and mental health. It is unfair to put all the blame on media alone.

Chairperson (Mr. Rao): Thank you, Arjun. Now, I leave the judgment to our judges.

A Debate on Social Media Boon or a Ban?

Chairperson: Good evening, everyone. Welcome to today’s debate on the topic, "Social Media: Boon or Ban?" Our first speaker is Riya, who will argue that social media is a boon. Riya, please share your thoughts.

Riya (Pro – Social Media is a Boon):

Thank you. Social media is a boon for many reasons. First, it connects people worldwide. Friends and family can stay in touch no matter where they are. It also provides a platform for people to share their ideas and talents. Many businesses use social media to reach new customers and grow. Social media helps raise awareness about important issues and can be a powerful tool for social change. It also offers access to a wealth of information and learning resources.

Chairperson: Thank you, Riya. Now, let’s hear from our second speaker, Raj, who will argue that social media should be banned. Raj, please present your views.

Raj (Con – Social Media Should be Banned):

Thanks. I believe social media should be banned due to its negative impacts. First, it can be addictive and lead to time-wasting. People often spend hours scrolling, which affects productivity. Social media also spreads misinformation and fake news, which can be harmful. It can lead to privacy issues, with personal information being misused. Additionally, it can contribute to mental health problems, such as anxiety and depression. The negative aspects of social media outweigh its benefits.

Chairperson: Thank you, Riya and Raj, for your perspectives. The judges will now review the arguments and provide their verdict. Thank you all for participating.

A Debate on "Education kills creativity"

Chairperson: Good evening, everyone. Welcome to today’s debate on the topic, "Education Kills Creativity." Our first speaker is Priya, who will argue that education does kill creativity. Priya, please share your thoughts.

Priya (Pro – Education Kills Creativity):

Thank you. Education often focuses too much on memorizing facts. Students are tested on what they know rather than on their own creative ideas. This emphasis can limit creativity. Standardized tests demand right answers and don’t encourage new ways of thinking. Schools have strict curriculums, which leaves little room for creative activities. This pressure to fit in can prevent students from exploring their creative potential.

Chairperson: Thank you, Priya. Now, let’s hear from our second speaker, Arjun, who will argue that education does not kill creativity. Arjun, please present your views.

Arjun (Con – Education Does Not Kill Creativity):

Thanks. I believe education does not kill creativity. Instead, it provides essential knowledge and skills that help with creative thinking. It teaches students how to think critically, which supports creativity. Many schools now include arts and other creative subjects. Teachers encourage innovation and new ideas in their classes. Education also exposes students to diverse concepts, which can inspire creativity. With the right balance, a structured approach can actually foster creativity.

Chairperson: Thank you, Priya and Arjun, for your insights. The judges will now review the arguments and provide their verdict. Thank you all for participating.